Table of Contents | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
| 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidents | ||||||||||
| Dangerous Goods Leaker | 352 | 330 | 285 | 272 | 167 | 188 | 194 | 167 | 151 | 131 |
| Main-Track Switch in Abnormal Position | 15 | 8 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 12 |
| Movement Exceeds Limits of Authority | 101 | 71 | 104 | 107 | 115 | 102 | 95 | 93 | 102 | 90 |
| Runaway Rolling Stock | 11 | 18 | 16 | 20 | 15 | 9 | 9 | 19 | 11 | 12 |
| Signal Less Restrictive than Required | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Unprotected Overlap of Authorities | 22 | 32 | 24 | 16 | 11 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 5 |
| Crew Member Incapacitated | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| Total | 502 | 463 | 443 | 438 | 333 | 330 | 322 | 303 | 295 | 251 |
| Assigned Factors* | ||||||||||
| Equipment | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 1 |
| Track | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Actions | 147 | 124 | 159 | 174 | 110 | 134 | 112 | 105 | 117 | 99 |
| Failure to Protect | 14 | 7 | 12 | 14 | 34 | 44 | 42 | 39 | 39 | 36 |
| Failure to Secure | 8 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 11 | 6 | 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Failure to Use Equipment Properly | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Inadequate/ Inappropriate Communication | 2 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Overlap of Authorities | 115 | 92 | 120 | 113 | 40 | 56 | 49 | 45 | 58 | 42 |
| Vandalism | 4 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Other | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Total | 151 | 131 | 161 | 185 | 117 | 138 | 121 | 111 | 127 | 100 |
* The TSB does not investigate all occurrences; therefore, assigned factors may not represent TSB findings. More than one factor may be assigned to each occurrence. For non-dangerous goods incidents only.
| 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidents | ||||||||||
| Newfoundland & Labrador | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nova Scotia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| New Brunswick | 4 | 2 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 7 |
| Quebec | 40 | 60 | 50 | 25 | 14 | 12 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 |
| Ontario | 119 | 110 | 100 | 89 | 65 | 59 | 74 | 65 | 46 | 34 |
| Manitoba | 31 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 11 | 24 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 17 |
| Saskatchewan | 10 | 8 | 13 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Alberta | 69 | 37 | 55 | 74 | 37 | 54 | 43 | 43 | 45 | 31 |
| British Columbia | 78 | 103 | 52 | 55 | 28 | 34 | 47 | 32 | 30 | 31 |
| Northwest Territories | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Canada | 352 | 330 | 285 | 272 | 167 | 188 | 194 | 167 | 151 | 131 |
| Leak by Location/ Component* | ||||||||||
| Structural | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| Safety Appurtenances | 81 | 85 | 82 | 66 | 19 | 37 | 25 | 34 | 27 | 25 |
| Operating Appurtenances | 165 | 184 | 177 | 148 | 107 | 105 | 110 | 86 | 65 | 74 |
| Auxiliary Appurtenances | 48 | 41 | 31 | 46 | 32 | 28 | 34 | 25 | 25 | 13 |
| Other | 50 | 13 | 14 | 19 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 8 |
| Total | 350 | 327 | 306 | 280 | 172 | 186 | 188 | 156 | 134 | 120 |
* More than one leak location/component may be assigned to each occurrence.
The following definitions apply to railway occurrences that are required to be reported pursuant to the Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board Act and the associated regulations.
An accident resulting directly from the operation of rolling stock, where:
An incident resulting directly from the operation of rolling stock, where:
An injury that is likely to require admission to a hospital.
An accident is considered to have dangerous goods involvement if any car in the consist carrying (or having last contained) a dangerous good derails, strikes or is struck by any other rolling stock or object. It does not mean that there was any release of any product. Also included are crossing accidents in which the motor vehicle involved (e.g., a tanker truck) is carrying a dangerous good.
Accident totals are not presented by railway. The track, train and personnel in an occurrence may all belong to different companies; also, an occurrence may have several contributing factors. Presenting data based purely on one of these criteria or factors would be misleading, and misinterpretation of data by readers could unfairly affect a company's competitive position.
1. It is agreed by convention that, for a result to be considered statistically significant, its probability must be lower than 1 in 20 (that is, p<.05).
2. Factors assigned are conditions and/or acts that may have played a role in an occurrence.
3. It is agreed by convention that, for a result to be considered statistically significant, its probability must be lower than 1 in 20 (that is, p<.05).